USPTO serial 86130239
BROOKLYN HEADPHONE COMPANY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4650625Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 2, 2014
- Examiner
- POWERS, ALEXANDER L
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BROOKLYN HEADPHONE COMPANY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Carteret, NJ
Carteret, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Uri Dallal
PO BOX 340256BROOKLYN, NY 11234-0256UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Earphones and headphones | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 1, 2014 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 9, 2021 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 2, 2019 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2014 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Oct 27, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 27, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 9, 2014 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2014 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2014 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 7, 2014 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 4, 2014 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 4, 2014 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2014 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 30, 2014 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 30, 2014 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 13, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 15, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 11, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |