Drawing for ISPERSE

USPTO serial 86150908

ISPERSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCPHERSON RAYBURN, SHAVELL A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ISPERSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard Y. Kim

RICHARD Y. KIM MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP500 N CAPITOL ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20001-1531UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Drug delivery agents consisting of compounds that facilitate delivery of a wide range of pharmaceuticals; Drug delivery agents in the form of powders that provide controlled release of the active ingredients for a wide variety of pharmaceuticalsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 26, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 26, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 2, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 1, 2017EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
May 25, 2017EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
May 25, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 17, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 13, 2017EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jan 13, 2017EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 13, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 14, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 13, 2016EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 1, 2016EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 1, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 18, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 17, 2016EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 12, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 6, 2016EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 6, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 26, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 25, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 25, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 1, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 1, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 20, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 25, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 25, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 5, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 4, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 23, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 17, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 6, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 6, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 26, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 24, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 2, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 2, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 2, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 10, 2014MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Jan 9, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 26, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance