USPTO serial 86160704
LEIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PINO, BRIAN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LEIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Mountain View, CA
Menlo Park, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Laura M. Franco
LAURA M FRANCO WINSTON & STRAWN LLP101 CALIFORNIA STSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-5894UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Hologram apparatus; computer hardware and software for generating, projecting and displaying holograms; scientific apparatus and instruments for generating, projecting and displaying holograms; scientific apparatus and instruments for scientific use and/or research, namely, hologram apparatus for generating, projecting and displaying holograms; optical and physical apparatus for generating, projecting and displaying virtual images, 3D images, and holograms, namely, LED screens, LCD screens and backlights for use with LED and LCD screens | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 2016 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Aug 29, 2016 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 29, 2016 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 29, 2016 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 29, 2016 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 29, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2015 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 16, 2014 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2014 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2014 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 9, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 16, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 30, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 30, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 29, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 14, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 21, 2014 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 21, 2014 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 21, 2014 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 9, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 18, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 11, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |