Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 86178777?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/86178777. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns BIG HOLE GOLF?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 86178777, the listed owner(s) include: DAN STRIMPLE, INC..

What is USPTO serial number 86178777?

Serial number 86178777 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark BIG HOLE GOLF. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

Which trademark classes cover BIG HOLE GOLF?

The public record lists International Classes: 041. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9/5

USPTO serial 86178777

BIG HOLE GOLF

Q: What is the current status of BIG HOLE GOLF?

BIG HOLE GOLF (86178777) currently shows USPTO status code 601 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601

Filing date: Jan 29, 2014
Status date: Nov 9, 2017
Registration date: —
Examiner: BLOHM, LINDA
Law office: TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BIG HOLE GOLF?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

DAN STRIMPLE, INC.
IRVING, TX
Other trademarks owned by DAN STRIMPLE, INC.

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey D. Harty

Jeffrey D. Harty Nyemaster Goode, P.C.700 Walnut StreetSuite 1600Des Moines, IA 50309

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
041	Providing golf facilities, namely, a golf course without conventional putting greens and having closely mown areas, such as putting greens, collars/fringe, fairways and tees, having turf maintained at substantially the same height	ACTIVE	Aug 27, 2012

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Nov 9, 2017	MAB1	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT	—
Nov 9, 2017	ABN1	ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED	—
Nov 8, 2017	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Nov 6, 2017	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Nov 6, 2017	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 6, 2017	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 6, 2017	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 6, 2017	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 2, 2017	RCCK	SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION	—
Oct 28, 2016	RCSC	REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED	—
Apr 28, 2016	RCSC	REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED	—
Oct 28, 2015	RCSC	REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED	—
Apr 28, 2015	RCSC	REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED	—
Apr 17, 2015	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Oct 17, 2014	GNS3	NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED	—
Oct 17, 2014	GNSL	LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED	—
Oct 17, 2014	CNSL	SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN	—
Oct 6, 2014	ARAA	ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 6, 2014	REAP	TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED	—
Oct 6, 2014	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Oct 6, 2014	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Oct 6, 2014	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 3, 2014	GAUN	NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED	—
Oct 3, 2014	GAUD	NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED	—
Oct 3, 2014	NAUD	REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED	—
Sep 18, 2014	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Sep 18, 2014	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Sep 18, 2014	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 9, 2014	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 9, 2014	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 9, 2014	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 5, 2014	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Feb 10, 2014	NWOS	NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED	—
Feb 1, 2014	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—