Drawing for RUMCHATA

USPTO serial 86184947

RUMCHATA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAI, TINA HSIN
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RUMCHATA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John E. Munger

JOHN E. MUNGER Jansson Munger McKinley & Kirby Ltd.601 Lake Ave.Racine, WI 53403UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Candy; coffee; coffee pods; coffee-based beveragesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 16, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 16, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 19, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 18, 2017EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Sep 8, 2017EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Sep 8, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 8, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 6, 2017EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 6, 2017EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 6, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 10, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 19, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 15, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 15, 2016NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Sep 14, 2016EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 14, 2016DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 9, 2016EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 9, 2016DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Sep 9, 2016ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Sep 9, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 22, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 21, 2016EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 14, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 11, 2016EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 11, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 15, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 10, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 8, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 8, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 8, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 10, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 13, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 13, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 24, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 9, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 9, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 25, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 25, 2014XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 25, 2014GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 25, 2014GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 25, 2014CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 7, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 6, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 6, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 14, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 14, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 14, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 9, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 19, 2014MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Feb 18, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 8, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance