Drawing for PEAR TECHNOLOGIES

USPTO serial 86195933

PEAR TECHNOLOGIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
REEVES, APRIL ELIZABETH
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with PEAR TECHNOLOGIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Theodore R. Remaklus

THEODORE R. REMAKLUS WOOD, HERRON & EVANS, L.L.P.441 VINE ST STE 2700CINCINNATI, OH 45202-2814UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Personal computers; laptop computers; handset and tablet mobile digital electronic devices for the sending and receiving of telephone calls and/or any digital data and for use as a handheld computer, namely, tablet computers, smartphones, mobile telephones, cell phones and personal data assistants (PDAs); apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound or images; videophones; tablet computers for displaying videos; prerecorded computer programs for personal information management; database management software; software for preparing, viewing, sending and receiving electronic mail and electronic messages; software for sending messages to electronic paging devices; computer hardware, software and firmware, namely operating system programs; application development computer software programs for personal and handheld computers or handheld mobile digital electronic devices; downloadable software for database management for use with smartphones, mobile phones, cell phones, tablet computers, personal computers and laptop computers; computer, handheld and mobile handset device peripherals products, namely, electronic cables, stylus, and protective cases for smartphones, mobile phones, cell phones and tablet computers; parts and fittings for all the aforesaid goodsACTIVE—
042Maintenance and updating of computer software; providing information concerning computer software via the internet and other computer and electronic communication networks; computer services, namely, managing web sites for others; providing server hosting services; Providing domain management services; Computer software consultancy, website design consultancy; all aforesaid services also as business to business and all aforesaid services also as business to consumer or consumersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 16, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 16, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 21, 2015GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 21, 2015GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 21, 2015CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jun 30, 2015RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jun 24, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 23, 2014GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 23, 2014GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 23, 2014CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 2, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 2, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 2, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 3, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 3, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 3, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 26, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 1, 2014MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Feb 28, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 21, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance