USPTO serial 86212457
CINEMASIM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DESAI, BRIN ANDERSON
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CINEMASIM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David L. May
DAVID L. MAY NIXON PEABODY LLP401 9TH ST NW STE 900WASHINGTON, DC 20004-2145UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware; Computer hardware and software that provides access to entertainment in the nature of interactive gaming, graphical depiction of games, and intra/inter game operation; Computer hardware and software for integration of text, audio, language translation, graphics, still images and moving pictures; Computer hardware and software for music, video, and movie viewing; Computer hardware and software for photo editing and viewing; Computer hardware and software for social networking; Computer hardware and software for streaming internet content of audio and video materials on the internet; Computer hardware and communications software for providing access to the Internet; Computer hardware, namely, removable media in the nature of blank USB flash drives, graphics cards, digital video recorders and players for personal computers, video game consoles, and cable television and satellite set top boxes for use with interactive multimedia applications in an entertainment and multi-media environment; Computer hardware and software for use in golf simulator systems; Electronic sports training simulators; Electronic sports training simulators, namely, golf training simulators | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, multimedia entertainment software production services, production of visual effects for videos, DVDs, television and for internet web sites, and audio production services; Entertainment services, namely, providing temporary use of non-downloadable interactive games, providing online, non-downloadable videos featuring golf instruction and golf simulation, and providing facilities for multi-media viewing of movies, shows, videos, and educational training; Multi-media entertainment services, namely, multimedia entertainment software production services, production of visual effects for videos, DVDs, television and for internet web sites, and audio production services; Multi-media entertainment services, namely, providing temporary use of non-downloadable interactive games, providing online, non-downloadable videos featuring golf instruction and golf simulation, and providing facilities for multi-media viewing of movies, shows, videos, and educational training; Providing facilities for entertainment services, namely, facilities for movies, sports tournaments, and recreation activities; Providing facilities for sports and sporting events; Providing various facilities for an array of entertainment environment services which allow users to access a wide range of multi-media interests, namely, providing cinema production facilities, sport and athletic game facilities, facilities for producing photography productions and television programs, and facilities for movies | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 7, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 10, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2016 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 6, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 5, 2016 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 6, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 11, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 22, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 6, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 18, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 18, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 3, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 2, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 7, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 6, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 20, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |