Drawing for KING CHEF

USPTO serial 86272833

KING CHEF

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KAUFMAN, LAURIE R
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with KING CHEF?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ting Geng

TING GENG THE LAW OFFICES OF GENG & ZHANG PLLC3907 PRINCE ST STE 3EFLUSHING, NY 11354-5321UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Boiled and dried fish; Candied fruit snacks; Canned fish; Canned fruits and vegetables; Crystallized fruits; Dried beans; Dried beef; Dried cranberries; Dried edible algae; Dried edible fungi; Dried edible seaweed (hoshi-wakame); Dried fish; Dried fruit and vegetables; Dried fruit-based snacks; Dried meat; Dried shellfish; Dried soybeans; Dried vegetables; Frozen fish; Fruit and soy based snack food; Fruit-based snack food; Meat-based snack foods; Nut-based snack foods; Preserved fish; Preserved fruits; Preserved ginseng for use as a vegetable; Preserved meats and sausages; Preserved, dried and cooked fruit and vegetables; Preserved, dried and cooked olives; Preserved, dried and cooked vegetables; Preserved, frozen, dried or cooked vegetables; Raisins; Seed-based snack bars; Tinned fruits; Tinned meat, fish, vegetables and fruits; Vegetable-based snack foodsACTIVEMar 8, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 2, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 2, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 21, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 21, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 21, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 11, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 20, 2014MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
May 17, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 9, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance