USPTO serial 86274551
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
TRÜBBACH, CH
OERLIKON ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES AG
BALZERS, LI
OERLIKON ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES AG
BALZERS, LI
FL-9496 Balzers, LI
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael W. Garvey
MICHAEL W. GARVEY PEARNE & GORDON LLP1801 E 9TH ST STE 1200CLEVELAND, OH 44114-3108UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Compounds for use in the manufacture of semiconductors, namely, oxides, nitrides, oxinitrides and carbides for coating glass, semiconductors, metal, ceramic and plastic | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 007 | Machines and equipment for the manufacture or processing of workpieces such as semiconductor products, photovoltaic detectors, solar cells, light-emitting devices, including LEDs and OLEDs, tools and parts, namely, vacuum plasma treatment systems comprised of a high frequency, high voltage generator, controls, and treatment chamber and structural parts therefor for coating, evaporation, plasma treatment and plasma etching, especially for thin-film coating, evaporation, epitaxy and plasma treatment | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | Chemical source material for the deposition of thin films upon semiconductor wafers sold incorporated into semiconductors | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Scientific services and research work, namely, drafting, design and scientific analysis of vacuum treatment processes, especially vacuum coating processes such as sputter deposition, chemical gas phase deposition, epitaxy, also with plasma assistance, and of semiconductor products, tools, parts and vacuum treatment plants for manufacturing and processing operations | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 2022 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 24, 2020 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2019 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 24, 2015 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Oct 22, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 14, 2015 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 14, 2015 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 6, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2015 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 25, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 25, 2015 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 4, 2015 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2015 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2015 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 25, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 5, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 5, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 26, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 25, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 26, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 20, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |