Drawing for MILME

USPTO serial 86299084

MILME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HETZEL, DANNEAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MILME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark Harrison

MARK HARRISON VENABLE LLPPO BOX 34385WASHINGTON, DC 20043-4385UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009eyeglasses; sunglassesACTIVE—
042Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for database management, data processing and displaying data; software as a service (SAAS) used for operating mobile phones and other mobile communications apparatus and devices; Software as a service (SAAS) services in the field of healthcare, featuring software used in devices worn by humans that tracks and analyzes eye movements and eye blinking, that detects how alert or tired a person is based on eye movements, and that provides data output and alerts to the users of such wearable devices, software for use in connection with computing devices with sensors that are worn by humans, software used for detecting, monitoring and measuring biometric, health and fitness data, calories burned, and posture, software that detects, monitors, measures and analyzes electroculography signals captured by sensors in wearable devices, and software that syncs smartphones and wearable devices with respect to transmission of health related personal dataACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 31, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 30, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 27, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 1, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 1, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 12, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 28, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 28, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 6, 2015ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 6, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 26, 2015MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2015GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 27, 2015GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 27, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 8, 2015ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 8, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 7, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 30, 2014MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 1, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 1, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 1, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 16, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 6, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance