Drawing for Serial No. 86307653

USPTO serial 86307653

Serial No. 86307653

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RIRIE, VERNA BETH
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 86307653?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sara Centioni Kanos

SARA CENTIONI KANOS NEXSEN PRUET LLCPO BOX 10648GREENVILLE, SC 29603-0648UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006prefabricated modular platforms and stairs with handrails and ladders, made of metalACTIVEOct 4, 2010

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 31, 2016MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 30, 2016ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 30, 2016EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 21, 2016EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
May 2, 2016GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
May 2, 2016GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
May 2, 2016CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Apr 18, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 18, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 8, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 28, 2016ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Mar 28, 2016EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 28, 2016JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 28, 2016EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 28, 2015GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Sep 28, 2015GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 28, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 24, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 21, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 21, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 21, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 21, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 21, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 27, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 26, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 26, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 24, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 24, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 24, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 17, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 24, 2014MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jun 23, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 16, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance