USPTO serial 86309879
BIANCO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RICHARDS, SUSAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BIANCO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
TAICHUNG CITY, TW
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MORTON J. ROSENBERG
MORTON J. ROSENBERG ROSENBERG, KLEIN & LEE3458 ELLICOTT CENTER DR STE 101ELLICOTT CITY, MD 21043-4178UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | ELECTRIC GRINDERS FOR HOUSEHOLD USE; ELECTRIC MINCERS FOR HOUSEHOLD USE; ELECTRIC MIXER FOR HOUSEHOLD USE; ELECTRIC BLENDERS FOR HOUSEHOLD USE; COFFEE GRINDERS, OTHER THAN HAND OPERATED; ELECTRIC FOOD PROCESSORS; ELECTRIC FRUIT PRESSES FOR HOUSEHOLD PURPOSES; POWER OPERATED MEAT CHOPPING MACHINES; ELECTRIC MILLS FOR HOUSEHOLD USE; ELECTRIC WASTE DISPOSAL, ELECTRIC GARBAGE DISPOSAL; ELECTRIC WHISKS FOR HOUSEHOLD PURPOSES; ELECTRIC FOOD BLENDERS FOR HOUSEHOLD PURPOSES; ELECTRIC CHEESE MAKING MACHINE; CONFECTIONERY MAKING MACHINES FOR CAKES; ELECTRIC TEA PROCESSING MACHINES; ELECTRIC NOODLE MAKING MACHINES; ELECTRIC FLOUR MILL MACHINES; ELECTRIC DIRECT CURRENT MOTORS; ELECTRIC VACUUM CLEANERS | ACTIVE | Dec 10, 2012 |
| 011 | ELECTRIC FOOD DEHYDRATOR; ; ELECTRIC WATER MACHINE; ELECTRIC GARBAGE DISPOSAL; ELECTRIC TOASTER; ELECTRIC HUMIDIFIER; ELECTRIC DEHUMIDIFIER; ELECTRIC FOOD STEAMER; ELECTRIC WATER KETTLE; ELECTRIC AIR PURIFIER; ELECTRIC COFFEE MAKER; ELECTRIC EGG BOILER; ELECTRIC FANS; ELECTRIC BOTTLE WARMER; ELECTRIC OVENS; ELECTRIC BREAD BAKING MACHINE; ELECTRIC BEVERAGES COOLING APPARATUS; ELECTRIC COFFEE ROASTER; ELECTRIC FILTERS FOR DRINKING WATER; ELECTRIC STERILIZERS; ELECTRIC WATER PURIFYING APPARATUS AND MACHINES | ACTIVE | Dec 10, 2012 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 30, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 24, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2014 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Sep 24, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 26, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |