Drawing for DIGIBANK

USPTO serial 86314605

DIGIBANK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TRUSILO, KELLY JEAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DIGIBANK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David E. Sipiora

DAVID E SIPIORA KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP1400 WEWATTA ST STE 600DENVER, CO 80202-5549UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Taxation services, namely, tax assessment, consultation, preparation, and filing services; financial intermediary services, namely, facilitating the channeling of funds between lenders and borrowers by connecting lenders and borrowers; financial planning services relating to taxation, namely, tax planning, tax consultancy, and tax advisory servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 15, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 15, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 11, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 29, 2016TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Aug 29, 2016OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Aug 29, 2016OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Apr 27, 2016OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jan 28, 2016ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Dec 29, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 29, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 9, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 23, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 23, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 23, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 23, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 23, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 21, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 20, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 20, 2015ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Apr 20, 2015GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 20, 2015GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 20, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 6, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 6, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 6, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 4, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 4, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 4, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 28, 2014MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jun 27, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 23, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance