Drawing for GOVIDEO

USPTO serial 86314742

GOVIDEO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
REEVES, APRIL ELIZABETH
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GOVIDEO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jennifer L. Day

JENNIFER L. DAY BOSE MCKINNEY & EVANS LLPSTE 2700111 MONUMENT CIRINDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer monitors, DVD players and recorders, video cameras and recorders, portable digital electronic devices for audio recording, transmitting and playback; home theater systems comprising DVD players, audio amplifiers and audio speakers; home security products, namely, security alarms; apparatus for recording, transcribing, reproducing and viewing sound and images; and accessories for all of the foregoing, namely, batteries, power supplies, electric cables, video cables and carrying casesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 26, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 26, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 5, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 4, 2017EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jun 30, 2017EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jun 30, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 7, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 6, 2017EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jan 6, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 8, 2016EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 8, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 6, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 5, 2016EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 20, 2016EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 20, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 2, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 30, 2016EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 28, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 15, 2015EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 15, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 28, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 27, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 27, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 7, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 7, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 8, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 20, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 25, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 25, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 5, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 22, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 17, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 30, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 30, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 30, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 30, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 29, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 28, 2014MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Jun 27, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 23, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance