USPTO serial 86334410
BENEFICIATIONPLUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REEVES, APRIL ELIZABETH
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BENEFICIATIONPLUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Charlotte, NC
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Advanced coal processing technology BeneficiationPlus is a unique coal processing technology that upgrades coal and, in parallel, produces clean streams of high-value hydrocarbons, water and pipeline-grade CO2. Simply put, BeneficiationPlus is to coal what oil refining is to crude oil - it fractions feedstock and aligns each output component with the highest value off-taker. The ideal feedstock for this technology is lignite and sub-bituminous coals, as they can provide highest yield of hydrocarbons, such as C1 to C12 with minimal impurities, and achieve the highest upgrade of BTU per ton. Compared to existing technologies, BeneficiationPlus is more than traditional coal upgrading, but it is not coal gasification nor is it coal liquifaction. Thanks to the elegant technical design of the solution, only a portion of coal is converted to hydrocarbons, leaving the balance as upgraded coal. As a result, capital requirements for the technology are relatively modest, and multiple high-value outputs result in a payback between 3 to 5 years | ACTIVE | Jan 15, 2014 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 22, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 8, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 24, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 17, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |