USPTO serial 86364757
MEDNEXUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HENRY, NAKIA D
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 129 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MEDNEXUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David Postolski
DAVID POSTOLSKI GEARHART LAW LLC41 RIVER ROAD INNOVATION PLZSUMMIT, NJ 07901UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Scientific and medical research tool in the nature of a communications software, namely, in the field of healthcare, medicine, and information technology related to healthcare and medicine; Internet search engine informational tool in the nature of computer search engine software related to providing information to healthcare and medical providers in the field of scientific and medical research, such as medical publications and research articles and scientific and medical practices; Computer search engine software, namely, providing a content management platform in the field of scientific and medical research for healthcare and medical providers; Internet search engine informational tool in the nature of computer search engine software with a focus on providing information to healthcare and medical providers in the field of scientific and medical research, such as medical publications and research articles and scientific and medical practices; Internet search engine informational tool in the nature of computer search engine software providing recommendations to healthcare providers related to the clinical relevance and importance of medical publications | ABANDONED | Feb 15, 2014 |
| 042 | Scientific and technological services, namely, providing a scientific and medical research in the field of healthcare, medicine, and information technology related to healthcare and medicine; Provision of internet search engines related to providing information to healthcare and medical providers in the field of scientific and medical research, such as medical publications and research articles and scientific and medical practices; Provision of internet search engine and website, namely, providing a content management platform in the field of scientific and medical research for healthcare and medical providers; Provision of internet search engine and website with a focus on providing information to healthcare and medical providers in the field of scientific and medical research, such as medical publications and research articles and scientific and medical practices; Provision of Internet search engine providing recommendations to healthcare providers related to the clinical relevance and importance of medical publications; providing temporary use of an on-line non-downloadable software for content management in the field of scientific and medical research for healthcare and medical providers; providing temporary use of an on-line non-downloadable software for use in database management with a focus on providing information to healthcare and medical providers in the field of scientific and medical research, such as medical publications and research articles and scientific and medical practices | ABANDONED | Feb 15, 2014 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 2016 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 26, 2016 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 26, 2016 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 26, 2016 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 5, 2016 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 30, 2015 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2015 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 21, 2015 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2015 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 22, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 4, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 3, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 3, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 3, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 18, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 18, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 27, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 27, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 25, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 25, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 29, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 25, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 21, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 15, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |