USPTO serial 86370484
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin J. McDevitt
KEVIN J. MCDEVITT NEAL & MCDEVITT, LLC1776 ASH STNORTHFIELD, IL 60093-3001UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Chili; beef stew; canned pork and beans; baked beans; canned beans; canned fruits and vegetables; frankfurters; luncheon meats; canned meats; meatballs; cheese, namely, parmesan and romano; cheese spreads and dips; snack dips; processed potatoes; instant potatoes; soups; bacon bits; frozen vegetables | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Prepared pasta and dry pasta; rice, pasta or noodles with seasonings and/or sauces combined in unitary packages; prepared meals consisting primarily of pasta, noodles or rice; frozen meals consisting primarily of pasta, noodles or rice; frozen appetizers; pizza, pizza sauce, pizza crust and kits comprised of ingredients for preparing pizza; gravy and gravy mixes; sauces and sauce mixes; dry seasoning mixes; salad dressings; condiments; canned ready to eat meals; baking mixes; breadcrumbs, food coatings and batters; hot chocolate | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 8, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 8, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 10, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 2, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |