Drawing for QUINN

USPTO serial 86432331

QUINN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CAPSHAW, DANIEL
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with QUINN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert P. Ziemian

Robert P. Ziemian Haynes and Boone LLP2323 Victory Avenue, Suite 700Dallas, TX 75219UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Granola based snack bars; Oatmeal based snack barsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 6, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 6, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 23, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 23, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 13, 2018CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Apr 13, 2018COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Dec 23, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 21, 2017EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 21, 2017EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 21, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 16, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 14, 2017EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 14, 2017EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 14, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 16, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 14, 2016EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 14, 2016EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 14, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 14, 2016NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Jul 13, 2016DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 11, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 17, 2016DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jun 17, 2016ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Jun 15, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 13, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 13, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 13, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 22, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 27, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 27, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 7, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 22, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 22, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 26, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 26, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 26, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 26, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 26, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 12, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 12, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 12, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 12, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 12, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 12, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 11, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 30, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 27, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance