USPTO serial 86433478
HYDRADIANCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAYES, GINA CLARK
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HYDRADIANCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Castletown, IM
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Pamela B. Huff
PAMELA B. HUFF Dykema Gossett PLLC112 East Pecan Street, Suite 1800San Antonio, TX 78205UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics, perfumes, eau de toilettes, eau de colognes, essential oils, soaps, beauty milks, deodorants for the body; skin creams; skin moisturizing gels; body milks; skin lotions; skin masks, pomades, skincare powders and non-medicated skin care preparations; cosmetic sun oils; cosmetic preparations for bronzing and tanning of the skin, namely, skin bronzing creams; depilatory products; hairsprays and hair lotions; shampoo; aftershave lotions; nail varnish; cosmetic preparations for baths; eye shadow, blusher, foundation, make-up and make-up remover; false eyelashes, cosmetic sets comprised of cosmetics and make-up | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 12, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 14, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 27, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 27, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 10, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 31, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 29, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 29, 2015 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Nov 1, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |