Drawing for CENTRALWAY STATEMENT

USPTO serial 86443692

CENTRALWAY STATEMENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ARANT, LUCY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CENTRALWAY STATEMENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Justin P. Welch

JUSTIN P. WELCH BAKER & MCKENZIE LLP2001 Ross Avenue2300 Trammell Crow CenterDALLAS, TX 75201-2968

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for processing digital music files for administration of computer network, for controlling the operation of audio and video devices; software for organizing, displaying, and analyzing data in the fields of finance, financial investments, monetary affairs, insurance, real estate, and telecommunications; software for corresponding with third parties for the purpose of making transactions, receiving data, and sending data in the fields of finance, financial investments, monetary affairs, insurance, real estate, and telecommunicationsACTIVE—
036Insurance services, namely, underwriting in the fields of health insurance, auto insurance, accident insurance, unemployment insurance, casualty insurance, life and property insurances, and credit insurance; financial affairs and monetary affairs, namely, financial information, management and analysis services; financial affairs and monetary affairs, namely, providing financing to freelancers, start-ups, existing businesses, and non profits; real estate affairs, namely, real estate brokerage, financial evaluation of real estate, real estate appraisal and mortgage market appraisalACTIVE—
042Scientific and technological services, namely, research and design in the field of computer networking hardware, computer datacenter architecture; industrial analysis and research services, namely, industrial research in the field of web-based technology and design; design and development of computer hardware and softwareACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 31, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 31, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 22, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 20, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 20, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 20, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 20, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 3, 2015CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Nov 2, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 7, 2015EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Sep 29, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 4, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 4, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 15, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 26, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 22, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 4, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 3, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 2, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 2, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 2, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 9, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 9, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 9, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 15, 2014MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Nov 14, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 7, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance