Drawing for FOREST FRIENDS

USPTO serial 86465337

FOREST FRIENDS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THOMAS, JULIE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FOREST FRIENDS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Denise Taliaferro

Colleen Caissie-Dupuis c/o IGT Canada ULC328 Urquhart AvenueMoncton, New Brunswick, E1H2RSCANADA

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer programs for games, amusement, or entertainment purposes, namely, programs for operating electric and electronic gaming machines; Computer game software downloadable via the internet; downloadable computer game software for playing games on the internet, on gaming machines and for games on mobile phones; computer software that allows users to access and play online games via wireless and mobile devicesACTIVE—
028Electric and electronic coin and token-operated amusement machines; Coin-operated gaming machines and lottery machines; Automatic gaming machinesACTIVE—
041Providing on-line computer games; Casino services; Casino services featuring a jackpot system involving one or more automatic slot machines, the jackpot system having a fixed minimum value of amount of money that can be won with said amount increasing over time until the jackpot is actually wonACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 22, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 22, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 20, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 23, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 23, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 3, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 13, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 13, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 13, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 11, 2017ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Oct 5, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 5, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 19, 2017GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 19, 2017GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 19, 2017CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jun 6, 2017RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 1, 2016GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 1, 2016GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 1, 2016CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 1, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 1, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 26, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 22, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 22, 2016ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jul 20, 2016ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jun 21, 2016GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 21, 2016GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 21, 2016CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Dec 18, 2015RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 18, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 15, 2015GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 15, 2015GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 15, 2015CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 15, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 15, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 8, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 1, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 1, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 27, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 27, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 27, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 27, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 4, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 29, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance