USPTO serial 86527991
POLYGEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CALLAGHAN, BRIAN P
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with POLYGEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
West Long Branch, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J. Doherty
MICHAEL J DOHERTY DOHERTY IP LAW GROUP LLC37 BELVIDERE AVEWASHINGTON, NJ 07882-1451UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 022 | polyester fiber material treated with a chemical composition that draws body heat away from a user that is used for making mattresses, mattress toppers, pillows and cushions | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 2017 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 27, 2017 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 27, 2017 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 13, 2017 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 26, 2016 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2016 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2016 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 29, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 29, 2016 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 29, 2016 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 29, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 29, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 2, 2015 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 1, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 1, 2015 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 1, 2015 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 24, 2015 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 11, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |