USPTO serial 86532930
SAFE HOUSE INTERNATIONAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAI, TINA HSIN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SAFE HOUSE INTERNATIONAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Raj Abhyanker
Raj Abhyanker LegalForce RAPC Worldwide, P.C.446 E Southern Ave.Tempe, AZ 85282UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Consulting services in the fields of insurance; Financial evaluation services for insurances; Insurance services, namely, insurance brokerage; Insurance planning | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software for use in providing and managing information in the fields of insurance; application service provider (asp) services featuring software for use in providing and managing information in the fields of insurance | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Security consultancy; monitoring of security systems; surveillance services; and control of building environmental access and security systems; Electrical protection services for central offices, namely, electronic monitoring services for security purposes in the fields of residences, businesses and commercial properties; anti-theft and break-in alarm services, namely, monitoring anti-theft, intruder and burglar alarms; fire alarm and protection services, namely, monitoring fire alarms and fire detection systems; services for monitoring waterflow alarms; industrial process supervision services, namely, consultation services in the field of the fire prevention, personnel and workplace safety and personnel and workplace security needs of commercial and industrial companies; security and fire alarm and detection system monitoring services; remotely monitoring fire alarms and security systems for sites, namely, homes, businesses and commercial properties; consultation regarding the integration of solutions with regard to fire and property and personal security, namely, consulting services in the fields of fire detection, property security, and personal security from break-ins; consulting services with regard to security, namely, fire detection, property security, and personal security from break-ins; and security services with regard to protection against fires and break-ins, namely, monitoring telephone calls from subscribers of fire protection systems and property security systems and notifying emergency facilities; Alarm response and verification services; monitoring of alarms, security systems and residential and commercial automation systems for security purposes; remote monitoring of alarms, security systems and residential and commercial automation systems for security purposes; monitoring of computer systems for security purposes, namely, remote monitoring of computer systems in the fields of security systems, fire alarms, alarm central units, anti-intrusion alarms, burglar alarms, personal health and security alarms, smoke and gas alarms, residential and commercial surveillance systems, lighting controls, residential and commercial automation devices, sprinkler systems for fire protection, vehicle, pet and personnel location, automobile safety, vehicle theft, traffic, and road navigation, all of the foregoing for security purposes; fire alarm sprinkler and water flow monitoring services for fire alarm security purposes; control of building environmental access and security systems; monitoring telephone calls from subscribers and notifying emergency facilities; theft recovery services, namely, tracking, locating and monitoring of vehicles via a computer network; electronic monitoring services for security purposes in the field of pets, homes, people and business buildings; providing security consulting and security consulting via telephone hotline; monitoring telephone calls and messages from subscribers and notifying emergency facilities from call centers in the fields of security systems, fire alarms, alarm central units, anti-intrusion alarms, burglar alarms, personal health and security alarms, smoke and gas alarms, residential and commercial surveillance systems, lighting controls, residential and commercial automation devices and sprinkler systems for fire protection; providing security consulting via telephone hotline and monitoring telephone calls from subscribers and notifying emergency facilities from call centers in the fields of vehicle security and navigation; and concierge services for others comprising making requested personal arrangements and reservations and providing customer-specific information to meet individual needs rendered together in vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Turner, Steven
- Other trademarks owned by Turner, Steven
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named SAFE HOUSE INTERNATIONAL
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 13, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 11, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 25, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 25, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 14, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 22, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 23, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 12, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 14, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 20, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 6, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 20, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 20, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 28, 2015 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |