Drawing for BRAVEHEART FREEDOM

USPTO serial 86533164

BRAVEHEART FREEDOM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GARTNER, JOHN M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BRAVEHEART FREEDOM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Elise Tenen-Aoki

ELISE TENEN-AOKI TA IP LAW, P.C., A LAW CORPORATION14271 JEFFREY ROAD, SUITE 313IRVINE, CA 92620UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Special edition or custom passenger land vehicles, namely, trucks, sedans, coupes, convertibles and SUVs; trim packages, namely, automotive exterior and interior metal decorative and protective trim; suspension upgrade kits comprising lowering springs, low profile tires and larger wheelsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 1, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 1, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 7, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 6, 2018EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Sep 4, 2018AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 27, 2018EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Aug 27, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 21, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 19, 2018EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Feb 19, 2018EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Feb 19, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 5, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 1, 2017EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 1, 2017EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 1, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 11, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 9, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 9, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 9, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 31, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 29, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 29, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 29, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 1, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 5, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 5, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 16, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 27, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 27, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 27, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 27, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 27, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 2, 2015GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Sep 2, 2015GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 2, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 1, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 31, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 31, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 25, 2015GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
May 25, 2015GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
May 25, 2015CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
May 19, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 3, 2015MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Feb 28, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 16, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance