Drawing for HYPERLOOP

USPTO serial 86556581

HYPERLOOP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KUNKLEMAN, SARAH E
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HYPERLOOP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Elizabeth Lee D'Amore

Elizabeth Lee D'Amore LUCAS & MERCANTI, LLP100 South Jefferson RoadSuite 202Whippany, NJ 07981

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
039Providing transportation services and a transportation system, namely, transport of passengers in low friction tubesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 1, 2025TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 1, 2025ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 1, 2025REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 3, 2020MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 29, 2020ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 29, 2020EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 14, 2020EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Feb 13, 2020GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 13, 2020GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 13, 2020CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Dec 18, 2019JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 16, 2019GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Oct 16, 2019GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Oct 16, 2019CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Oct 1, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 1, 2019CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Sep 26, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 26, 2019ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Sep 26, 2019EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 26, 2019JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 26, 2019EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 27, 2019GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Mar 27, 2019GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 27, 2019CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 16, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 15, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 15, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 20, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 20, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 18, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 18, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 30, 2018RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 31, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 24, 2017RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 20, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 6, 2017RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 6, 2016RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 10, 2016WOAGWITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED—
Mar 10, 2016WOARTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED—
Jan 4, 2016RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 25, 2015GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 25, 2015GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 25, 2015CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 17, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 17, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 17, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 11, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 11, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 11, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 10, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 17, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 17, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 8, 2015TAEATEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED—
Apr 8, 2015PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Apr 6, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 6, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 20, 2015MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Mar 19, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 10, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance