USPTO serial 86570572
AEROTRAK BY INTER MEDIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SETTLES LEWIS, SHAILA E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AEROTRAK BY INTER MEDIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Laurence E. Stein
LAURENCE E. STEIN Muncy Geissler Olds & Lowe P C4000 Legato Rd Ste 310Fairfax, VA 22033-2898UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computerized tracking and control systems, namely, software modules, user interfaces, network interfaces, transponders and transmitter/receivers for tracking and controlling remotely piloted and/or autonomous aerial vehicles; computerized tracking systems, namely, software modules, user interfaces, network interfaces, transponders and transmitter/receiver devices for tracking piloted, remotely piloted, and/or autonomous aerial vehicles; user interface systems and devices for computerized tracking and/or controlling remotely piloted, and/or autonomous aerial vehicles, namely, touch pads, displays, software modules, trackpads, keyboards, virtual keyboards, dash boards, virtual dash boards, virtual cockpits, motion sensors, and joy-sticks for tracking and controlling remotely piloted aerial vehicles; backend computerized command and control systems for tracking and/or controlling remotely piloted aerial vehicles and/or autonomous aerial vehicles; web-based systems for tracking aerial vehicles; web-based dashboards for tracking and controlling remotely piloted aerial vehicles and/or autonomous aerial vehicles; web-based virtual cockpits for tracking and controlling remotely piloted aerial vehicles and/or autonomous aerial vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 17, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 30, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 31, 2015 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |