USPTO serial 86586715
FORSIGHT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HOWARD, PARKER WALDRIP
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FORSIGHT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alain Villeneuve
ALAIN VILLENEUVE Duane Morris LLPSuite 3700190 S. LaSalle StreetChicago, IL 60603Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Consulting in the field of installation, use and maintenance of software designed to plan information technology hardware infrastructure capacity changes | ACTIVE | Dec 5, 2014 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2017 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 19, 2017 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 19, 2017 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 10, 2017 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Feb 15, 2017 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Jan 20, 2017 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2017 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2017 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 21, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 9, 2016 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2016 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2016 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 23, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2016 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 19, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 19, 2016 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 19, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 19, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 1, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 8, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 16, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 13, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |