Drawing for LITEOS

USPTO serial 86589987

LITEOS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RINKER, ANTHONY MICHAEL
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LITEOS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Susan Upton Douglass

SUSAN UPTON DOUGLASS Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu P C4 TIMES SQUARE, 17TH FLOORNew York, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for collecting and managing data; operating system software; computer hardware; computer servers; wearable digital electronic devices with wireless and remote control functions for use with mobile phones comprised primarily of software to display callers' numbers and messages, as well as monitor motion data and sleep quality, remote control of mobile phone photography and display information on screens, and also featuring a bracelet; mobile phones; gateway routers in the nature of computer control hardware for use in motor vehicles; household gateway routers in the nature of computer control hardware; televisions; network and wireless routersACTIVE—
035Providing an online market for both buyers and sellers for goods and services; displaying advertisements for others in various media; providing online commercial information; conducting promotions for others; commercial evaluation; professional business consultingACTIVE—
042Website design consulting; information technology consulting; computer system analysis; consulting for computer hardware design and development; computer software design, computer system design; design and development of computer hardware; consultancy in the field of computer software and hardware for purposes of encouraging computer networking innovation; Software as a Service (SaaS) for database management of information in the cloud; computer programming; design and development of computer website protocol; development of common voluntary industrial standards for electronic intercommunication equipment; design and development of computer software for structure communication among computer processors; test for computer software and hardware, in the nature of technical support services, namely, troubleshooting in the nature of diagnosing computer hardware and software problemsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 1, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 1, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 21, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 20, 2018EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Aug 16, 2018EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Aug 16, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 18, 2018DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 18, 2018AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 16, 2018APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Mar 19, 2018DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Mar 19, 2018TPADTEAS PETITION TO AMEND BASIS RECEIVED—
Mar 3, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 1, 2018EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 1, 2018EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 1, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 4, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 3, 2017EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 28, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 7, 2017NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Sep 6, 2017TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Sep 6, 2017PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 6, 2017PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 1, 2017EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 5, 2017CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED—
Mar 3, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 1, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 1, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 1, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 31, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 30, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 26, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 26, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 26, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 1, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 5, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 5, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 16, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 25, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 7, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 6, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 6, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 18, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 14, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 16, 2015MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Apr 15, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 13, 2015TAEATEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED—
Apr 13, 2015PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Apr 10, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance