USPTO serial 86590149
LANO LANOLIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 4, 2017
- Examiner
- COGAN, BRITTNEY LORRAINE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with LANO LANOLIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Buzz Consulting Communications Marketing Events Pty Ltd
Vaucluse NSW 2030, AU
Other trademarks owned by Buzz Consulting Communications Marketing Events Pty Ltd
Buzz Consulting Communications Marketing Events Pty Ltd
Vaucluse NSW 2030, AU
Other trademarks owned by Buzz Consulting Communications Marketing Events Pty Ltd
VACUCLUSE 2030, AU
VACUCLUSE, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Eugene M. Pak
Eugene M. Pak Fennemore Wendel1111 Broadway, 24th FloorOakland, CA 94607UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics for lips, namely, lip balms, lip creams; cosmetic lip treatments, namely, lip repairers, non-medicated lip care preparations, lipsticks, and lip gloss; Hand, face and body lotions and moisturizers; Beauty creams; [ Cosmetic creams; Body oils; Cosmetics for treatment of dry skin; ] Skin moisturizers; Facial cleansers; [ Hand and body cleansers; Cosmetic soaps; ] Skin soaps; Perfumed soap; Ointments for cosmetic use, namely, lip creams | ACTIVE | Mar 16, 2016 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Buzz Consulting Communications Marketing Events Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Buzz Consulting Communications Marketing Events Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by LANOLIPS PTY LTD
- Other trademarks owned by LANOLIPS PTY LTD
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named LANO LANOLIN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 4, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2023 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2023 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 8, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 9, 2023 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2022 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 8, 2017 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 28, 2017 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2017 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 27, 2017 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 27, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 10, 2017 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2017 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 3, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2017 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 1, 2017 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 2, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 7, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 18, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 28, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 22, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 22, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 1, 2016 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 31, 2016 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 31, 2016 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 9, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 14, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 15, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 10, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |