Drawing for OAKVILLE WINERY

USPTO serial 86601290

OAKVILLE WINERY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TRIPI, CYNTHIA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 118- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OAKVILLE WINERY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

J. Scott Gerien

J. SCOTT GERIEN Dickenson Peatman & Fogarty1455 1st St Ste 301Napa, CA 94559-2822UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Alcoholic beverages except beersACTIVEFeb 15, 2009

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 27, 2016MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jun 27, 2016ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jun 24, 2016EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Feb 17, 2016GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 17, 2016GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 17, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 12, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 10, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 10, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 10, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 10, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 10, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 1, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 27, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 21, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance