Drawing for PITU

USPTO serial 86617866

PITU

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FINNEGAN, TIMOTHY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PITU?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Martin P. Hoffman

Martin P. Hoffman Stein IP LLC1990 M Street, N.W.Suite 610Washington, DC 20036

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
039A patient stretcher or bed, namely, a conveyance for receiving and moving a person that may be infected or contagiousACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 22, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 22, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 16, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 15, 2019NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
May 15, 2019EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
May 15, 2019PGEXPETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED—
May 15, 2019APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
May 14, 2019EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
May 13, 2019EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
Apr 1, 2019ERTITEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION INQUIRY LETTER—
Mar 4, 2019PILMPETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED—
Feb 25, 2019APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Dec 21, 2018EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Dec 20, 2018EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 20, 2018PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2018TPDRTEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED—
Jul 23, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 23, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 21, 2018EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 13, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 12, 2018EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 12, 2018AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 2, 2018NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
May 2, 2018PGEXPETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED—
Apr 20, 2018PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER—
Apr 20, 2018ERTPTEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION DEFICIENCY RECEIVED—
Mar 22, 2018PRIMPETITION INQUIRY LETTER MAILED—
Mar 22, 2018APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Mar 14, 2018APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Dec 21, 2017EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 20, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 27, 2017PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Sep 27, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 27, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 27, 2017TPDRTEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED—
Jun 21, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 20, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 23, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 23, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 21, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 21, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 26, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 26, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 6, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 23, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 21, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 2, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 2, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 22, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 16, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 13, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 13, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 13, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 13, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 13, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance