USPTO serial 86681271
QUDOS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEASER, ANDREW C
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with QUDOS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Vancouver, BC, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charlene M. Krogh
CHARLENE M. KROGH DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP1400 WEWATTA STSTE 400DENVER, CO 80202-5549Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Providing an online business directory featuring business services and service providers, consultants, contractors, firms, and agencies, all in the fields of public relations, management consulting, copywriting, law, marketing, advertising, design, IT, recruitment, accounting, event management, logistics, and manufacturing; all excluding providing recognition, feedback, ratings, reviews and recommendations on employers, employees and places of employment | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Online electronic publishing services, namely, publication of compilations, computer-generated rankings, content, or articles about services provided by businesses, professionals, consultants and contractors; all excluding providing recognition, feedback, ratings, reviews and recommendations on employers, employees and places of employment | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing a search engine and portal featuring technology that allows business users to find, receive computer-generated evaluations of, communicate with and compare business services provided by service providers, consultants, contractors, firms, and agencies, all in the fields of public relations, management consulting, copywriting, law, marketing, advertising, design, IT, recruitment, accounting, event management, logistics, and manufacturing; Providing a search engine to find, receive computer-generated evaluations of, communicate with and compare business services, service providers, consultants and contractors; Providing a search engine to find, receive computer-generated evaluations of, communicate with and compare business vendors and products; Providing an online search engine and portal featuring technology, namely, an online platform for connecting business vendors and customers that allows users to retrieve information for the purpose of ranking and enabling users to evaluate business services provided by service providers, consultants, contractors; Providing an interactive website featuring technology that allows users to log in and access marketing opportunity data and receive leads about potential customers; Providing an interactive website featuring technology that allows users to log in and request information from businesses, namely, via a Request for Information or Request for Proposal; all excluding providing recognition, feedback, ratings, reviews and recommendations on employers, employees and places of employment | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 28, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 2, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 20, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 14, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 22, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 20, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 5, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 14, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 14, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 8, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 4, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |