Drawing for BROADWAYCON

USPTO serial 86684467

BROADWAYCON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HERRERA-MARCUS, ROSELLE MORALDE
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BROADWAYCON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Monica P. McCabe,

MONICA P. MCCABE, PHILLIPS NIZER LLP485 Lexington Avenue14th FloorNEW YORK, NY 10017

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, namely, pants and shortsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 11, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 11, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 26, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 24, 2018EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 24, 2018EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jul 24, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 8, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 3, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 1, 2018EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 1, 2018EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 1, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 4, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 2, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 2, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 2, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 23, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 23, 2017NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Feb 22, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 22, 2017DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 13, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 8, 2017INCDITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST—
Feb 8, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 18, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 18, 2017DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jan 18, 2017ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Jan 18, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 2, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 7, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 7, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 18, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 2, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 2, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 2, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 2, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 2, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 1, 2016ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 26, 2016PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Apr 5, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 5, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 5, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 5, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 5, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 1, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 31, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 31, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 31, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 17, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 17, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 17, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 14, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 10, 2015MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jul 9, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 9, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance