USPTO serial 86701886
PRNCPL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAITO, KIM
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PRNCPL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Long Island City, NY
Long Island City, NY
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Bracelets; Brooches; Charms; Charms for collar jewelry and bracelet; Children's jewelry; Gemstone jewelry; Gold thread jewelry; Hair jewelry in the nature of jewelry for use in the hair; Inexpensive non-jewelry watches; Jewelry; Jewelry boxes; Jewelry cases; Jewelry dishes; Jewelry for attachment to clothing; Jewelry for the head; Jewelry in the nature of armbands; Jewelry pins for use on hats; Jewelry ring holders; Jewelry watches; Jewelry, namely, anklets; Jewelry, namely, arm cuffs; Jewelry, namely, bracelets, wristbands and necklaces that also provides notification to the wearer of a pending medical related task; Jewelry, namely, collar tips of precious metal; Jewelry, namely, dog tags for wear by humans for decorative purposes; Key chains as jewelry; Leather jewelry and accessory boxes; Pet jewelry; Pet jewelry for Dogs, Cats; Plastic bracelets in the nature of jewelry; Rings being jewelry; Scarf clips being jewelry; Watches and jewelry; Women's jewelry | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 27, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 26, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 31, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 11, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 21, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 21, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 20, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 20, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 5, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 29, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |