USPTO serial 86738436
NIKKEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HETZEL, DANNEAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NIKKEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas A. Kulik
THOMAS A KULIK SCHEEF & STONE LLP500 N AKARDSUITE 2700DALLAS, TX 75201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Multilevel business marketing services for others in the fields of health, beauty and nutritional care; Phone and mail order retail services, catalog retail services and ecommerce retail services, all in the field of general merchandise, namely, therapeutic magnetic products, furniture, bedding, massage devices, dietary supplements, food supplements, cosmetics and toiletries, clothing, jewelry, domestic water treatment systems, domestic air treatment systems, books, clothing, gifts, groceries and food, toys, music, electronics, sports and outdoor equipment, home furnishings, home appliances, magazines, watches; On-line ordering service via computer networks and global communication networks in the field of general merchandise, namely, therapeutic magnetic products, furniture, bedding, massage devices, dietary supplements, food supplements, cosmetics and toiletries, clothing, jewelry, domestic water treatment systems, domestic air treatment systems, books, clothing, gifts, groceries and food, toys, music, electronics, sports and outdoor equipment, home furnishings, home appliances, magazines, watches; Business information services in the nature of providing information on business opportunities related to independent direct sales businesses | ACTIVE | Aug 15, 1989 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2017 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 3, 2017 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 3, 2017 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 23, 2017 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Dec 22, 2016 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2016 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2016 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 16, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 28, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2016 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 28, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 28, 2016 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 26, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 26, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 26, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 4, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 3, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 31, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |