USPTO serial 86743973
CROWDPLAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CANTONE, KERI H
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CROWDPLAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Rafael, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert G. Lancaster
MARK A PASKAR BRYAN CAVE LLP211 N BROADWAYSTE 3600SAINT LOUIS, MO 63102-2726Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer game software for use by individual users featuring functionality for spectator/players to cast votes for dialog choices; Downloadable electronic games via the internet and wireless devices for use by individual users featuring functionality for spectator/players to cast votes for dialog choices; Interactive multimedia computer game programs for use by individual users featuring functionality for spectator/players to cast votes for dialog choices | ACTIVE | Jul 27, 2016 |
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, providing online electronic games for use by individual users featuring functionality for spectator/players to cast votes for dialog choices; Providing a website featuring entertainment information | ACTIVE | Jul 27, 2016 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 2018 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 16, 2018 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 16, 2018 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 16, 2018 | EXDM | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT | — |
| Apr 23, 2018 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2018 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 12, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 2, 2018 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 2, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 2, 2018 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 1, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2017 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2017 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2017 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 14, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 9, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2017 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2017 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 18, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 2017 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 17, 2017 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 17, 2017 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2017 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 15, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 21, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 20, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 21, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 5, 2015 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 4, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |