Drawing for TACHYUM

USPTO serial 86763872

TACHYUM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GOLDEN, LAURA DAWN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with TACHYUM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David A.W. Wong

David A.W. Wong Barnes & Thornburg LLP11 S Meridian StIndianapolis, IN 46204-3506UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer hardware; computer chips, electronic circuits, semiconductor devices and integrated circuits; computer software used to program, configure, verify and monitor computer chips, electronic circuits, semiconductor devices and electronic systems, and electronic and print instructional manuals sold therewithACTIVEMar 25, 2019
045licensing of intellectual property rights; licensing of microprocessor design file software; licensing of semiconductor intellectual property cores and instruction set architectures; licensing of technology in the field of computer hardware, software and semiconductors; licensing of computer softwareACTIVEMar 25, 2019

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 26, 2020MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 26, 2020ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 13, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 13, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 13, 2019CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 3, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 20, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 20, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 20, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 23, 2019ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Sep 30, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 3, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 3, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 3, 2019CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 9, 2019SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 7, 2019IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
May 7, 2019EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Oct 30, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 27, 2018EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Oct 27, 2018AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 23, 2018EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Oct 23, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 18, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 16, 2018EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Apr 16, 2018EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Apr 16, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 29, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 27, 2017EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 27, 2017EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 27, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 1, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 30, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 30, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 30, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 17, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 15, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 15, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 15, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 17, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 22, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 22, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 2, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 18, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 18, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 15, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 15, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 15, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 15, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 15, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 11, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 26, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 25, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance