Drawing for DATAMRI

USPTO serial 86768863

DATAMRI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RICHARDS, SUSAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DATAMRI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Caitlin R. Byczko

Caitlin R. Byczko Barnes & Thornburg LLP11 South Meridian StreetIndianapolis, IN 46204-3535UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable cloud computing software for use in electronic storage of data in a non-end-user environment for the purpose of analyzing and assessing non-structured data to understand the demographics and make up of a targeted data set and to identify potential benefits of such analyzing and assessing of the targeted data set and to identity security threats in the targeted data set; and computer services, namely data mining in the nature of collecting, searching, querying and analyzing non-structured data in a non-end-user environment for the purpose of analyzing and assessing non-structured data and for locating customer-defined targeted content and file attributes, namely, file size, file type, and the sensitivity and confidentiality of the file contents of the non-structure dataACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 1, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 1, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 30, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 28, 2018EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 28, 2018EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 28, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 31, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 29, 2018EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 29, 2018EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 29, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 17, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 16, 2018EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 27, 2017ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Dec 4, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 28, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 28, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 28, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 28, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 30, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 26, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 26, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 26, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 29, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 8, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 8, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 4, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 4, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 14, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 27, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 26, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 5, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 5, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 28, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 21, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 21, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 21, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 21, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 13, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 2, 2015MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Oct 1, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 29, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance