Drawing for MAGICUBES

USPTO serial 86769321

MAGICUBES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GOLDEN, LAURA DAWN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MAGICUBES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Larry Miller

LARRY MILLER Feder Kaszovitz Llp845 3rd Ave Fl 11New York, NY 10022-6601UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Toys, games and playthings, namely, dolls, toy vehicles, action figures, toy figures, spinning toys, toy guns, play sets for action figures, role playing toys in the nature of play sets for children to imitate real life occupations and accessories for all of the aforementioned; ride on toys, role playing toys; kites, infant toys, soft sculpture plush toys, stuffed and plush toys; toy figure molds, baby multiple activity toys, bath toys, children's multiple activity toys, construction toys; water squirting toys and accessories therefor, toy water guns and accessories therefor, laser light toy gun interactive with water and accessories therefor, toy water gun with laser sight and accessories therefor, and plastic and foam flying discs; electronic learning toys, floats for recreational use, namely, arm floats, foam floats and swim floats; handheld unit for playing video games, stand-alone video game machines, fortune telling game toyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 22, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 22, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 21, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 19, 2018EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 19, 2018EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 19, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 20, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 13, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 11, 2018EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 11, 2018EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 11, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 20, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 18, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 18, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 18, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 16, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 14, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 14, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 14, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 20, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 25, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 25, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 5, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 19, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 13, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 13, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 13, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 13, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 16, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 15, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 15, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 27, 2016CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
May 27, 2016COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jan 15, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 15, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 15, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 13, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 2, 2015MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Oct 1, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 29, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance