USPTO serial 86770077
MXMULTIVIEWER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PRATER, JILL I
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 119 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MXMULTIVIEWER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
67722 Winnweiler, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Catherine F. Hoffman
CATHERINE F. HOFFMAN Mayback & Hoffman P A5846 S Flamingo Rd # 232Cooper City, FL 33330-3237UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computersoftware; Video management software for operating video security and home automation systems and for configurating video systems and access control installations; cameras; door stations; Video software featuring real-time alarming, live intercommunication function and for triggering switching functions; Computersoftware, in particular for image processing and pattern recognition; Software-based controllers and/or automations, in particular for control and/or automation with and/or for the aforesaid goods, in particular for access control and/or monitoring and/or for the inspection of technical processes; video management systems, in particular for the display, evaluation, administration, configuration and control of multiple cameras; video camera systems, in particular for research and recording | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunications services, in particular provision of devices for transmitting data, in particular for the live transmission of image data and/or for the performance and/or monitoring of functions, including alarm systems, building management and/or automation | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Scientific and technological services; Industrial analysis and research services; Design and development of computer hardware and software; Computer programming for data processing, in particular for the transmission of live images via data links and/or for controlling electric apparatus and/or monitoring audio and/or visual data | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 18, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 18, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 2, 2015 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |