USPTO serial 86806383
LIVEHAPPY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LIVEHAPPY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Glen Allen, VA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Austin Padgett
AUSTIN PADGETT TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP600 PEACHTREE ST. NE, SUITE 5200ATLANTA, GA 30308UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Interactive educational software featuring instruction in the field of leadership, personal development and self improvement, for use in computers, cell phones, smart phones, tablet computers, mobile electronic devices and other electronic devices; software and applications for use in the fields of planning, scheduling, and analyzing one's life and time; computer application software for mobile phones, namely, software for use in the fields of planning, scheduling, and analyzing one's life; application software for mobile terminal, namely, computer application software for smart phones and tablet computers, namely, software for use in the fields of planning, scheduling, and analyzing one's life; footwear; clothing, namely, pullovers, skirts, dresses, blouses, jeans, trousers, jackets, coats, raincoats, shirts, t-shirts, sweatshirts, hoodies, shorts, underclothes, bathing suits, pajamas, gloves; headgear, namely, hats, caps, knitted caps and berets; footwear, namely, shoes, slippers, boots, sandals, beach shoes, sports shoes, lace boots, wedges, flats, heels; stockings; belts; ties, neckties, shawls, scarves, mufflers, neck scarves, collars for dresses, wristbands, suspenders, braces for clothing, garters, bandanas, headbands; sportswear, namely, sport shirts, sport shorts; clothing for infants, toddlers, and children, namely, swimwear, shirts, blouses, dresses, skirts, pants, slacks, shorts, coveralls, creepers, overalls, jackets, vests, hats, sleepwear, bunting, cloth bibs, booties, bonnets, footwear, and slippers; baby bibs not of paper; hats and socks for newborns | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 3, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 25, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 30, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 28, 2019 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 27, 2018 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 27, 2018 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 20, 2017 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 20, 2017 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 15, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 2, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 18, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 15, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 16, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 6, 2015 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |