Drawing for CHRISTOPHER KIMBALL'S THE KITCHEN

USPTO serial 86810120

CHRISTOPHER KIMBALL'S THE KITCHEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GARDNER, DAWNA BERYL
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with CHRISTOPHER KIMBALL'S THE KITCHEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Cathleen E. Stadecker

CATHLEEN E. STADECKER DOWNS RACHLIN MARTIN PLLC199 MAIN STREET, P.O. BOX 190BURLINGTON, VT 05402-0190UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Digital media, namely, DVDs, downloadable video recordings, and downloadable electronic publications in field of food and cooking; downloadable electronic data files featuring recipes; downloadable television and radio programs in the field of food and cooking provided via a video-on demand service; mobile applications for viewing and interacting with electronic publications in the field of food and cookingACTIVE—
016Printed publications, namely, books, magazines, newsletters and instructional material in the field of food and cookingACTIVE—
021CookwareACTIVE—
035Retail store and online retail store services featuring cookwareACTIVE—
041Cooking instruction; educational services, namely, providing online and live classes, seminars, workshops and conferences in the field of food and cooking and distributing material in connection therewith; providing online publications in the nature of articles, e-books, blogs and newsletters in the field of food and cooking; entertainment in the nature of live stage presentations in the field of food and cooking; organizing events, namely, cooking competitions, recipe contests and taste tests; entertainment in the nature of ongoing television and radio programs in the field of food and cookingACTIVE—
043Providing a website featuring non-downloadable videos and information in the field of food, cooking, recipes and cookwareACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 6, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 3, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 5, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 5, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 5, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 28, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 10, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 9, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance