Drawing for MATCHLESSFLAME

USPTO serial 86870167

MATCHLESSFLAME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JACKSON, SHA-KARA ELOUISE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MATCHLESSFLAME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Alexander J.A. Garcia

ALEXANDER J.A. GARCIA PERKINS COIE LLP1201 THIRD AVENUE, SUITE 4900SEATTLE, WA 98101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Consumer electronic products, namely, lighting fixtures, LED (light emitting diode) lighting fixtures, LED candles, flameless candles, scented electric candles, indoor electric candles, outdoor electric candles, electric pillar candles, electric votive candles, electric taper candlesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 13, 2020ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 22, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 22, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 22, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 20, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 20, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 20, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 20, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 25, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 25, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 5, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 16, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 31, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 31, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 31, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 31, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 20, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 19, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 19, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 11, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 11, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 11, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 27, 2016ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Apr 26, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 26, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 26, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 26, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 25, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 16, 2016MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Jan 15, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 12, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance