Drawing for DOPPLER

USPTO serial 86884150

DOPPLER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STRINGER, DANIEL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DOPPLER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David E. Rogers

DAVID E. ROGERS SNELL & WILMER LLP400 E. VAN BURENONE ARIZONA CENTERPHOENIX, AZ 85004

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Software for monitoring mobile devices, receiving healthcare information, updating software on mobile devices, and developing and storing statistical healthcare dataACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 8, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 8, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 8, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 6, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 6, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 6, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 6, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 11, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 11, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 21, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 30, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 30, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 30, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 30, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 30, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 27, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 26, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 26, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 26, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 26, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 26, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 25, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 28, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance