Drawing for MICROLABS

USPTO serial 86899106

MICROLABS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ROSENTHAL, AARON
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MICROLABS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Julia K. O'Neill

Julia K. O'Neill Bowditch & Dewey, LLP200 Crossing BoulevardFramingham, MA 01702UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009A testing system for use in undergraduate engineering education, comprised of silicon, plastic or glass chips used to perform experiments demonstrating particular engineering concepts, and a portable test station consisting of hardware and electronics that conduct and display the experiments and display and record experimental data, together with custom designed software including explanations of relevant technological material, lecture notes, experiment guidelines and data analysis guidesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 2, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 2, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 6, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 24, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 22, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 22, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 22, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 23, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 21, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 21, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 21, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 28, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 28, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 16, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 30, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 5, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 5, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 15, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 1, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 23, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 11, 2016MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Feb 10, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 9, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance