USPTO serial 86904158
FITBOX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FITBOX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alex Patel
ALEX PATEL PATEL & ALMEIDA, P.C.16830 VENTURA BLVD SUITE 360ENCINO, CA 91436UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Providing fitness and exercise facilities; fitness training services and consultancy; physical fitness instruction; fitness training; providing online non-downloadable videos in the field of fitness, exercise, and nutrition; providing a web site featuring information on exercise and fitness; educational services, namely, providing web-based, classroom and other training in the field of exercise equipment, physical fitness, diet and nutritional programs for certification of and continuing education for instructors and distribution of training material in connection therewith; educational services, namely, conducting classes, seminars, conferences, workshops, and field trips in the field of exercise equipment, diet and nutritional programs, and sales techniques and distribution of training material in connection therewith; membership club services, namely, providing training to members in the field of exercise equipment, diet and nutritional programs, and sales techniques; educational services, namely, offering of assessments and surveys in the field of educator training and performance for the purpose of improving teaching procedures; providing information in the field of exercise training | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 8, 2017 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Sep 8, 2017 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2017 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2017 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 31, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 17, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 1, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 5, 2017 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 4, 2017 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 4, 2017 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 23, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 27, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 18, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 13, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |