USPTO serial 86933850
BAMBULIFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SCHMIDT, JOHN JOSEPH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BAMBULIFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andy Morgan
ANDY W MORGAN MORGAN LAW GROUP PC1755 NORTH BROWN RDSUITE 200LAWRENCEVILLE, GA 30043Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, pants, slacks, t-shirts, dress shirts, ties, polo shirts, dresses, socks, hats, caps, shorts, swim trunks, swim suits, bikinis, sweaters, jackets, underwear, blouses, gloves, scarves, head bands, coats, pull overs, sweat suits, sweat shirts, sweat pants, sneakers, shoes, boots, slippers, tank tops, halter tops and skirts, all of the foregoing made using bamboo either wholly or in combination with other materials of which bamboo will comprise a substantial part | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 2017 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 6, 2017 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 6, 2017 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 22, 2017 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 22, 2017 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2017 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2017 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 4, 2017 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 6, 2016 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2016 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2016 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2016 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 17, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 17, 2016 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 9, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 17, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 17, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 3, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 5, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 2016 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |