CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for FREE TO BE

USPTO serial 86953778

FREE TO BE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BURKE, LAUREN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FREE TO BE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Edward Klaris

Edward Klaris Edward Klaris, Klaris Law PLLC1115 Broadway, 11th FloorNew York, NY 10010UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Video games, namely, computer video game software, mobile video game software in the nature of electronic game software for handheld devices, wireless devices and cellular telephones and computer game software for use on mobile or cellular phones, video game discs and interactive video game programsACTIVE—
028Toys and games, namely, board games, action skill games, educational games in the nature of educational card games and electronic educational game machines for children and card gamesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 13, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 13, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 13, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 12, 2019EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jun 12, 2019AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 10, 2019EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jun 10, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 2, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 4, 2018EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 4, 2018EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 4, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 14, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 12, 2018EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 12, 2018EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 12, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 30, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 28, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 28, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 28, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 25, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 23, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 23, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 23, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 12, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 12, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 13, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 18, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 18, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 28, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 31, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 31, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 31, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 31, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 31, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 26, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 25, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 25, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 27, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 25, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 30, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 29, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance