Drawing for NOW WE'RE TALKING!

USPTO serial 86954975

NOW WE'RE TALKING!

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HWANG, JOHN C B
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with NOW WE'RE TALKING!?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for natural language human-machine interfaces, namely, digital intelligent assistance software that capable of answering questions, performing tasks, notifying about important events, maintaining schedules, finding information, launching application, connecting with web services, providing proactive services, namely, recommendation to users based on user location, personal profile, time of day, weather services, calendars, social networks, and e-mail systems, and sending messages to other users participating in online communities to perform tasks for use in cross-platform desktops, portable, mobile, and wearable devices, smart home, car, and embedded chat information systems and digital assistants; Computer application software for mobile phones, portable media players, handheld computers, desktop computer, car communication systems, and smart home systems, namely, software for developing customable voice command systems, voice-enabled user interfaces, user conversational assistant applicationsACTIVEMar 23, 2016
042Application service provider ASP featuring software for use in artificial intelligence methods, natural language processing, natural language understanding, dialog systems, voice and speech recognition and text to speech systems, natural language human-machine interfaces and predictive assistance technologiesACTIVEMar 23, 2016

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 19, 2018MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 19, 2018ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 21, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 21, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 21, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 18, 2017RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Nov 22, 2017ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jun 12, 2017RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 12, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 12, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 12, 2016RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 7, 2016ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Nov 30, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 24, 2016GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 24, 2016GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 24, 2016CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 23, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 1, 2016MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Mar 31, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 31, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance