Drawing for CITYSTATE

USPTO serial 86971220

CITYSTATE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TRUSILO, KELLY JEAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CITYSTATE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Janis M. Manning

Janis M. Manning Verizon Trademark Services LLC1320 North Court House Road, 9th FloorArlington, VA 22201UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Non-downloadable software, SaaS, PaaS, and ASP featuring API software for smart communities monitoring, control, and deployment; non-downloadable software, SaaS, PaaS, and ASP featuring API software for analyzing, processing, and visualization of both real-time and stationary datasets; non-downloadable software, SaaS, PaaS, and ASP featuring API software for monitoring and controlling communication between computers and automated machine systems; non-downloadable software, SaaS, PaaS, and ASP featuring API software for visualized controlling and monitoring solutions and equipment of IoT network; non-downloadable software, Saas, PaaS, and ASP featuring API software for creating, managing, and deploying monitoring and automation services for smart communities; non-downloadable software, SaaS, PaaS, and ASP featuring API software for gathering, transmitting, analyzing, and utilizing real-time data, video, and information from public spaces for creating, managing, and deploying automation public services for smart communities; design and development of technologies, namely, computer hardware and software for smart communities; consulting services in the field of smart communities technology; computer technology support services, namely, installation, administration, monitoring, and troubleshooting of software problems in the field of smart communitiesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 9, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 9, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 4, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 2, 2019EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
May 2, 2019EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 2, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 6, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 2, 2018EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 2, 2018EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 2, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 3, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 1, 2018EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 1, 2018EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 1, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 4, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 2, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 2, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 2, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 2, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 2, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 2, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 7, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 7, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 15, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 1, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 31, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 30, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 30, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 28, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 28, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 28, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 26, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 16, 2016MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Apr 15, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 14, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance